Archive for the ‘Legislation’ Category

REP. ROWE SPONSORS TAX AND FEE REDUCTION LEGISLATION

Friday, December 4th, 2009

Robert H. Rowe
18 Jones Road
Amherst, NH 03031

November 30, 2009

NEWS RELEASE

REP. ROWE SPONSORS TAX AND FEE REDUCTION LEGISLATION

With the New Hampshire House of Representatives set to return for another session in January, Representative Robert Rowe, who represents the towns of Amherst and Milford, has submitted legislation that would bring some relief to the taxpayers of the State. Rep. Rowe is sponsoring a bill that would reduce the motor vehicle registration fee increases and sir-charges passed into law last session; legislation that raised fees by as much as $25.00 per vehicle.

“The motor vehicle fee increases for registration and vanity plates are creating a hardship for many of our citizens and businesses who can least afford it. The result in many cases is self defeating since many residents have chosen not to register a vehicle while some businesses have chosen to register vehicles out of state.”

His bill would also repeal legislation that doubles fees charged to New Hampshire businesses by the Department of Environmental Services. “Before increasing administrative fees, the State should first look to enacting department efficiencies,” said Rowe. “Small business is the backbone of the New Hampshire economy and during a down economic turn, fee and tax increases should never be an option,” he concluded.

Representative Rowe is the Republican Leader in the House Judiciary Committee and is serving his seventh term in the New Hampshire House. His bill will be debated by the Legislature during the 2010 session.

———-

For further information contact Representative Rowe by telephone at 673-2693

Good News, Bad News

Friday, October 16th, 2009

A Little Good News, Some Mixed News, But Even More Bad News in Concord
by Jeb Bradley
October 16, 2009

The recent release of New Hampshire’s revenue receipts simultaneously offers glimmers of hope while raising even more concerns about the State Budget enacted in June.

First the good news: The “Rainy Day Fund” which is the State’s hedge against economic downturns ended the fiscal year with $56 million more of a cushion than anticipated. Governor Lynch froze new hiring, deferred equipment purchases, and curtailed out of state travel to produce these savings.

Despite the fact that Governor Lynch and Democratic Legislators approved an overall spending increase in 2007 of 11.17% and in 2009 of 10.48%, the Governor’s executive orders curbed the worst excesses of the Legislature’s spending blitz that has increased expenditures from $9.36 billion to $11.5 billion during that time.

This $56 million in the Rainy Day Fund will be a critical one-time buffer if the State loses its NH Supreme Court appeal of the JUA (Joint Underwriting Association) lawsuit. This lawsuit comes from a budget provision attempting to simply “take” $110 million from a fund designed to keep a lid on physician’s medical liability insurance costs. The State’s attempted money grab has already been ruled in violation of both the State and Federal Constitutions by the Superior Court.

The mixed news is that business tax revenues were only 4% lower than expectations. While it is preposterous to call any shortfall good news, in comparison to last year’s business tax receipts that were off by 25%, being 4% below expectations is a slim glimmer of hope. However, it’s also a warning that if the trend continues the State will face a nasty budget deficit.

Despite the good and the mixed news, NH is far from out of the budget woe woods as the bad news dwarfs the good. Other revenue sources are badly underperforming, despite many taxes being increased in the budget. Receipts from the rooms and meals tax, communication tax, and real estate tax are all down by about 9%. The interest and dividend tax is down a whopping 25%. Even tobacco taxes are down slightly. In the three months since the budget was enacted revenues are down a total of $26 million or 6.4%. Should this trend continue the deficit will only grow.

Now that the state employees union has rejected the proposed contract that would have implemented 19 furlough days, Governor Lynch must begin a series of layoffs to save a mandated $25 million. Whether he will run into roadblocks if the union files a grievance for each position eliminated or political roadblocks from his allies in the Legislature – these savings may be questionable.

So with all these budget monkey wrenches, it is certainly understandable that its authors are quick to claim that the national economy is to blame and that revenues are likely to rebound when the economy turns around. But that is a cavalier attitude based on wishful thinking rather than rational evidence.

NH’s unemployment rate just jumped to 7.2% which means nearly 25,000 people have lost jobs this year. As bleak as that is, the national numbers are worse — much worse. Since the federal stimulus legislation was enacted in February, 2.7 million Americans have lost their jobs and the national unemployment rate is at a 26 year high of 9.8%. The human toll of these numbers is staggering for individuals, families and businesses struggling to stay afloat.

Some pundits have tried to argue that things are getting better as only 263,000 Americans lost their jobs in September vs. 741,000 in January. While true, any signs that employers may be thinking of adding jobs in the future is at odds with the evidence. Job losses continue, while overtime and the average length of the work week both fell. Employers don’t need to hire anytime soon and consumer spending which drives our economy continues its retreat.

So NH Legislators who voted for huge spending increases — not to mention the property tax hikes from cost shifting and 61 additional tax and fee hikes in the last two budgets — are desperately praying for a rebound in the economy to produce the revenue they need to balance their budget. Voters should not hold their breath waiting for miracles.

Instead what Democratic Legislative Leaders are planning is a TAX SUMMIT to discuss new and innovative ways to separate taxpayers from their hard earned dollars. Will these leaders recommend an income tax, a sales tax, a tax on mortgage refinancing, an entertainment tax, or new levies on New Hampshire businesses? Every one of these taxes or others could be on the table at a time that 53,330 New Hampshire people are out of work.

After hiking spending 23% in the last two budgets, raising property taxes and 61 other tax and fee hikes one would think that Democratic Legislative Leaders appetite for new and varied taxes would be satiated. Most NH voters are shaking their heads wondering if a SUMMIT to REDUCE SPENDING is too much to ask for. Isn’t it time for the Democrats to turn off the tax hike spigot and focus on fiscal discipline?

As tough as things are for families and businesses across NH, they will get much worse if taxes continue to climb to meet revenue shortfalls. Then we will have to re-title this blog to “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly”!

State Budget Neither Balanced nor Fiscally Responsible

Saturday, September 12th, 2009

To the Editor,
Claims by Democrats, most notably the Governor and the House Speaker, but also including State and local Democrat party chairs that this latest State budget is fiscally responsible would be laughable were it not so painful and precarious for New Hampshire taxpayers. With the current economic situation, state budgets across the nation are being reduced by an average of 2% yet New Hampshire spending will increase by over 7%. This follows a grossly irresponsible increase of 17.5% in the previous budget. How can the Governor claim that this is a budget “cut”? This is classic government-speak. If they cannot spend what they wish to spend, it’s a “budget cut”. Given that definition, my household budget suffers massive cuts annually.

In reality, this budget is neither fiscally responsible, nor balanced as the law requires. A recent court decision prevented the State from confiscating $110 million from the Joint Underwriters Association (a fund to assist physicians in purchasing malpractice insurance). Thankfully, the court stopped this theft of a privately owned fund to which the State contributed nothing. This budget was also “balanced” in the last minutes of the legislative session by miraculously discovering $75 million of projected revenue that somehow had not previously been available. Based on the past performance of the Democrats’ revenue projections I would say we’ll be in a mess again early next year when this miracle revenue does not appear. Worst of all, we continue to have a structural deficit of over $500 million which is being filled this budget cycle by one-time federal “stimulus” funds. It appears the only thing this money stimulates is an even more bloated New Hampshire State budget. And let’s not forget the 38 tax and fee increases included in this monstrosity.

The good news is that 7 of 8 State Representatives from the Amherst/Milford legislative district, as well as our State Senator Peter Bragdon voted against this irresponsible budget. Unfortunately, Shannon Chandley complied with the wishes of the Democrat leaders in the House and voted in favor of it. She has helped set us on a course to an income or sales tax in the next budget cycle unless real cuts are made. If Democrats are allowed to control our legislature for one more term, this is a near certainty. Please keep this in mind when you go to the polls in November 2010.

Mark Vincent
Amherst Republican Committee

Letter to the Editor – Cash for Clunkers is a Clunker

Saturday, September 12th, 2009

To the Editor,
Our two greatest economic problems are US Government debt and individual consumer debt. Yet, one solution that this administration has come up with is “cash for clunkers”. This program entices consumers to trade in old, lower mileage, yet operational and most likely paid-for automobiles for brand new models. The incentive is a $4500 credit for the alleged clunker paid by the federal government with money it does not have. The consumer then has to pay the rest which in most cases will mean a new auto loan. So our public debt is being increased so that individuals can take on more debt. And, let’s not forget that the clunkers, many of which are perfectly usable, must then be turned into scrap by having their engines destroyed. This will take hundreds of thousands of used vehicles off the market where they might otherwise have been purchased by consumers who are unable or unwilling (wisely) to take on more debt. They will have to pay more for a used vehicle or spend even more for a new model. Destroying perfectly good assets while piling up more debt: brilliant.

Mark Vincent
Amherst

Election Law Changes 2009

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009

This file contains the election laws affected by the 2009 Legislative Session.

http://www.sos.nh.gov/2009%20Election%20law%20changes.pdf

Please look them over as some changes may impact future election strategy.

2010 Election Schedule:

- 2010 Elections
- Filing period – June 2-11, 2010
- State Primary – September 14, 2010
- General Election – November 2, 2010

The Secretary of State’s Office has not posted the entire schedule, as of yet, but plan to soon.
Please bookmark the Secretary of State’s Website and log back to get the full, official, schedule.